Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/32 East Third Street
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shereth 21:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 32 East Third Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Is this even notable? It's a residence. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 00:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No, it's not notable. Even if the event was notable, a variant of the one-event rule should apply. Good grief. We are not going to have entries for every address where a major crime was committed. RayAYang (talk) 00:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Several crimes took place there, not just one. And there is a book by a notable publisher which serves as a reference. --Eastmain (talk) 00:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 00:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The address is not notable in and of itself. AlbinoFerret (talk) 01:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete So, every address mentioned in a book deserves it's own article? Every location, where a notable criminal planned crimes, deserves it's own page? Please. Radioinfoguy (talk) 15:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. RS coverage beyond the book is thin. Yes, two bodies were temporarily buried there, but other sources note that in passing. Third Street had several Winter Hill Gang-related homes on it. 32 Third had a relatively minor role. The killings at 799 get the bulk of the attention. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Stephen Flemmi article. Mandsford (talk) 23:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.