Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Tucker (photographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:13, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Mark Tucker (photographer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mark Tucker (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable commercial photographer. Fails WP:GNG at an rate. It's difficult for a photographer to become notable. This photographer did many album shoots, which explains the incoming links, but we are not going to have any encyclopedic information about the subject. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom. That's looks like long time stub ago. Well as fails WP:GNG. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Devokewater (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Nika2020 (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Passing mentions, but I didn't notice any outstanding (i.e. award-winning works) — Infogapp1 (talk) 21:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Could not find any significant coverage. ~Kvng (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete insufficient third party, independent sources to indicate compliance with WP:ANYBIO. ——Serial 16:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.