Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Trenwith
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 00:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- John Trenwith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 6. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 07:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep an obituary (so no BLP violation) in the Sunday Star Times says he's nationally notable in New Zealand, and is sufficient coverage. Quite clearly the author's motives were to cover Old Boys of this particular school, I don't see any problem with this motivation as long as the author sticks to policy. Barney the barney barney (talk) 11:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep sometimes even spammer get it right. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.