Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri Homberg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Terri Homberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is poorly constructed, and no effort has been made to improve it since its creation in December 2008. It has few references, and the ones that do exist don't seem to provide much evidence of notability or importance. magnius (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: That's not a reason to delete. See WP:RUBBISH. Jafeluv (talk) 23:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - inadequate evidence of notability - that IS a reason to delete. HeartofaDog (talk) 02:32, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It is a quite bad AfD rationale, and did anybody care to look for references? I added two refs from the New York Times, Gbooks also returns some theater listings with her name, only snippet views though. She seems to be a marginally notable actress, perhaps digging for more refs will find some. Power.corrupts (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Working actress that has not reached the notability threshold of our guidelines (substantial coverage in independent reliable sources). ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.