Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devyani Khobragade (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. N/C, but this article is going straight to BLP/N. It makes painful reading. Black Kite (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Devyani Khobragade

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Devyani Khobragade
• Articles for deletion/Devyani Khobragade (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Devyani Khobragade incident

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Devyani Khobragade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Earlier the page was CREATED as Devyani Khobragade and nominated for deletion in 2013 and as per discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devyani Khobragade incident The consensus at that time was clear that person fails WP:BIO notability as an individual however the incident was notble enough and therefore article was renamed and moved to Devyani Khobragade incident. I have gone through this article also, mostly it is news surrounding incident and publicity or limelight she got aftermath of Devyani Khobragade incident. I strongly feel as an individual she non notable. WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and Wikipedia:Too much detail also applies here hence Delete Thanks Jethwarp (talk) 12:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  << FR ^(mobileUndo) 12:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  << FR ^(mobileUndo) 12:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  << FR ^(mobileUndo) 12:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment The article Devyani Khobragade was created on December 17, 2013. Later it was moved to Devyani Khobragade incident after being nominated for deletion. This article was recreated independently on January 8, 2014‎. --Auric talk 17:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep The subject of this article meets WP:GNG. In particular, this diplomat has been the subject of international journalism in many media sources for four unrelated scandals. I just restored the scandal content to this article which was recently deleted. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment - WP:NOTNEWSPAPER - the controversy about her children passport and her posting are hardly encyclopedic information. The incident in US was notable enough and hence has been given her name as Devyani Khobragade incident. Also the Adarsh Housing Society Scam has many big politicians involved and there are many persons whom the flats were allotted apart from Khobergode. She was never party of FIR or investigation in the scam in fact other IAS officers like Jairaj Phatak were arrested and suspended (again WP:NOTNEWS) applied here. You have added back infos, which are just news stories, PLEASE SEE ALSO Wikipedia:Notability (events) AND Wikipedia:Too much detail, Wikipedia:Libel or much better essay @ Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not - Jethwarp (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

I prefer to respond to proposals at the article's talk page, and maybe we can do that if this article passes. For a deletion nomination this content and especially the sources cited need to be in the article for review. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 03:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 04:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.