kingjames.bible Kingjames.bible

   
The King James Bible

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Kingjames.bible?

• Kingjames.bible ranks #467,431 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Kingjames.bible?

• 3.94E-5% of global Internet users visit Kingjames.bible

How many people visit Kingjames.bible each day?

• Kingjames.bible receives approximately 1.9K visitors and 7,530 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Kingjames.bible receive most of its visitors from?

• Kingjames.bible is mostly visited by people located in Brazil,United States,Estonia.

How much Kingjames.bible can earn?

• Kingjames.bible should earn about $16.68/day from advertising revenue.

What is Kingjames.bible estimated value?

• Estimated value of Kingjames.bible is $16,944.69.

What IP addresses does Kingjames.bible resolve to?

• Kingjames.bible resolves to the IP addresses 2600:9000:254a:8a00:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1, 18.160.181.36.

Where are Kingjames.bible servers located in?

• Kingjames.bible has servers located in United States.

kingjames.bible Profile

Title:The King James Bible
Description:The King James Bible, the Holy Bible in English - Table of Contents
Category:Community and Society / Faith and Beliefs
Edit Site Info

What technologies does kingjames.bible use?

These are the technologies used at kingjames.bible. kingjames.bible has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
CDN
Amazon Cloudfront Amazon Cloudfront
Miscellaneous
Amazon S3 Amazon S3
PaaS
Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services

kingjames.bible Traffic Analysis

Kingjames.bible is ranked #467,431 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 7.5K pageviews. This equates to about 58.8K monthly visitors. Kingjames.bible traffic has increased by 275.23% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.9K
257.36%
Monthly Visits58.8K
275.23%
Pages per Visit3.88
178.76%
Visit duration02:59
471.51%
Bounce Rate40.10%
146.59%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,942
Monthly Visits:
58,843
Pages per Visit:
3.88
Daily Pageviews:
7,530
Avg. visit duration:
02:59
Bounce rate:
40.10%
Global Reach:
3.94E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
47,883
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
38,338
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
57,669
HypeRank:
467,431
SEMrush Rank:
2,417,218
SimilarWeb Rank:
467,431
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
98.89%
Referral:
0.42%
Search:
0%
Social:
0.01%
Paid:
0.68%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
16.70%
Mobile:
83.30%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

42.9K
DEC
15.7K
JAN
58.8K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Brazil 50.19%
 
United States 21.19%
 
Estonia 9.32%
 
India 5.62%
 
Nigeria 3.89%

Which sites are competitors to kingjames.bible?

Websites similar to kingjames.bible are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
kingjamesbibleonline.org
Compare >170K
Last update was 3 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with kingjames.bible in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,280

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  kingjames.bible
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,417,218
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  4,820
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  237
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $121.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $16.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $500.4 and annual gross revenue of approximately $6.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $16.9K.

How much would kingjames.bible make?

Daily Revenue:
$16.68
Monthly Revenue:
$500.40
Yearly Revenue:
$6,088.20
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 1,596$7.71
 
Brazil 3,779$5.03
 
Estonia 702$0.48
 
Nigeria 293$0.29
 
India 423$0.16

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1.87
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$55.97
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$681.00
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
821
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
24,625
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
299,603

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 287$1.39
 
Brazil 227$0.30
 
Estonia 182$0.13
 
India 119$0.05
 
Nigeria 6$0.01

How much is kingjames.bible worth?

Website Value:
$16.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
kingjames.bible
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
kingjames.bible
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
kingjames.bible
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is kingjames.bible hosted? ▼

Kingjames.bible may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2600:9000:254a:8a00:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1, 18.160.181.36
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 18.160.181.36

How fast does kingjames.bible load? ▼

The average loading time of kingjames.bible is 62 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 88.
Average Load Time:
62 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)715ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)50ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)470ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)655ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)43ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)674ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

88
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)808ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 74% 16% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)996ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)97ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)641ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)913ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)89ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)954ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 160 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 3.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 3.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 110 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 3.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does kingjames.bible use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on kingjames.bible are reduced by 84%.
kingjames.bible use gzip compression.
Original size: 43.34 KB
Compressed size: 6.67 KB
File reduced by: 36.67 KB (84%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. kingjames.bible supports HTTPS.
 kingjames.bible supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: kingjames.bible
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid from: May 1 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: May 30 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:26:04 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:26:04 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Organization: "Starfield Technologies, Inc."
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer:
Valid from: Sep 2 00:00:00 2009 GMT
Valid until: Jun 28 17:39:16 2034 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 kingjames.bible supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8
last-modified: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:27:45 GMT
server: AmazonS3
content-encoding: gzip
date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:01:02 GMT
cache-control: max-age=600
etag: W/"89e365d8cd9aeb0ad4f1560edbc2d9e7"
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-cache: Hit from cloudfront
via: 1.1 48a0ac8b67842a09a9b585c294dc3108.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: MSP50-P2
x-amz-cf-id: BI8Oo__V1Z3-Wapoo_ui8vko3PQKQi5xpMa05EtlVvz5es4yMduq3w==
age: 18

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all 300
TXT facebook-domain-verification=rdxqhlcersephhkch6swdjnc8ce0am 300
MX aspmx2.googlemail.com 86400
MX alt1.aspmx.l.google.com 86400
MX aspmx3.googlemail.com 86400
MX aspmx.l.google.com 86400
MX alt2.aspmx.l.google.com 86400
SOA 900
Mname ns-1470.awsdns-55.org
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:da00:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:2a00:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:6800:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:2e00:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:5200:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:4400:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:5e00:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
AAAA 2600:9000:254a:8a00:b:cf85:c1c0:93a1 50
A 18.160.181.36 50
A 18.160.181.65 50
A 18.160.181.43 50
A 18.160.181.110 50
NS ns-730.awsdns-27.net 7129
NS ns-114.awsdns-14.com 7129
NS ns-1727.awsdns-23.co.uk 7129
NS ns-1470.awsdns-55.org 7129

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on March 22, 2016 and will expire on March 21, 2029 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Epik LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 9, 2024.
Domain Created:
2016-03-22
Domain Expires:
2029-03-21
Domain Updated:
2024-02-09
Domain Age:
9 years 11 days
Domain Registrar:
Epik LLC
Domain Owner:
Anonymize, LLC.
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: KINGJAMES.BIBLE
Registry Domain ID: D24555-BIBLE
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.epik.com
Registrar URL: http://www.epik.com
Updated Date: 2024-02-09T05:45:45Z
Creation Date: 2016-03-22T11:30:09Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2029-03-21T23:59:59Z
Registrar: Epik LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 617
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.7373015923
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Name: Privacy Administrator
Registrant Organization: Anonymize, LLC.
Registrant Street: 30 N. Gould Street, Ste E
Registrant City: Sheridan
Registrant State/Province: WY
Registrant Postal Code: 82801
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.3076839553
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Admin Name: Privacy Administrator
Admin Organization: Anonymize, Inc.
Admin Street: 30 N. Gould Street, Ste E
Admin City: Sheridan
Admin State/Province: WY
Admin Postal Code: 82801
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.3076839553
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Tech Name: Privacy Administrator
Tech Organization: Anonymize, Inc.
Tech Street: 30 N. Gould Street, Ste E
Tech City: Sheridan
Tech State/Province: WY
Tech Postal Code: 82801
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.3076839553
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: NS-730.AWSDNS-27.NET
Name Server: NS-1727.AWSDNS-23.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-114.AWSDNS-14.COM
Name Server: NS-1470.AWSDNS-55.ORG
DNSSEC: Unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2023-08-04T06:07:25.268Z