Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maschetti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:43, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Maschetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Hoax article. PROD removed by author without explanation. Google hasn't heard of this manufacturer. DAJF (talk) 09:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason and recommend that the author be cautioned or blocked for creation of hoax articles:
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —DAJF (talk) 09:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Doesn't seem to be a hoax, see this. — neuro(talk) 09:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Delete unless sourced. The Google hits seem mostly irrelevant. The name "Maschetti" seems to be a surname, and nearly any surname will occur in a lot of pages with "car." Google starts off saying there are five hundred hits, but it runs out after 209. Also try Google searches for "Maschetti T" and "Maschetti TM" (with the quotation marks); I got only two hits apart from Wikipedia, neither relevant. If anyone finds anything truly relevant and reliable among those 209, or any other relevant reliable source, and adds it to this article, I'll reconsider. Fg2 (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, I misread the 4th result. — neuro(talk) 12:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm the original prodder of both articles, for the reasons stated above. Good faith google, gnews, and gbook search doesn't turn up this car manufacturer.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - hoax - I have also looked and failed to find any confirmation. JohnCD (talk) 15:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.