Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/DavidYork71 (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- DavidYork71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Michel Tavir (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Sizeless (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- LaughsAndLaughsAt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Poshgingersporty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Mayalld (talk) 15:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
tag team re-addition of blatant POV to Collaboration during World War II
- Comments
Read Mohammad Hatta. Read Sukarno. Two obvious obvious kingpin Indonesian collaborationists.
How and when was any reversion limit breached by anyone above?
So play the ball (the validity of the content supplied) rather than the men (intimidation and silence attempts against the other side of the content debate here). Many names are named as collabotors at the noted article: not 'POV', just a dose of reality. Otherwise why is the article there?
If the claims be found to be too challenging, direct, or accusative then exercise your right to temper the language thereof, but wholesale deletion of coverup of the historical fact and record is not on.
One more thing. The case of these two perps differs from that of the likes of foreign counterparts such as Pierre Laval amd Henri Petain in that they were never put on trial for what they did against their compatriots for the sake of the glory of the wartime occupying power of local significance. That's because they launched their coup, ultimately successful, to take over the state after they lost the protection of their Japanese friends, in '45. Would that we should all have such protectors and be so fortunate.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
- There is no allegation that 3RR has been reached by anybody.
- There is an allegation that all 4 of the users named above engaged in "tag-teaming", in an attempt to make it appear that there are several people who believe that removal of this blatant POV passage is a bad idea, and that all of the accounts are actually under the control of a single person.Mayalld (talk) 16:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
- Typical DY71 behaviour. DrKiernan (talk) 10:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]